From de9bc34d06d7987708809d0cac838e44d9625373 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Louie S Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2024 18:35:23 -0500 Subject: Reorganize into a table --- dash-docset-contributions.html | 157 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-) (limited to 'dash-docset-contributions.html') diff --git a/dash-docset-contributions.html b/dash-docset-contributions.html index fb4eb74..270c6fc 100644 --- a/dash-docset-contributions.html +++ b/dash-docset-contributions.html @@ -1,35 +1,134 @@

Dash/Zeal Docset Contributions

I package docsets for documentation generally unavailable through Dash/Zeal docsets.

My Dash docsets are based on a common generation template.
Dash docsets maintained by me include:

- -

* indicates that the docset creation script could use improvement, usually in indexing index entries
^ indicates that a new version needs to be packaged, uploaded to the releases tab of the repo, and pushed to Dash-User-Contributions

-

I also have several unofficial Dash docsets that I maintain, but do not intend to contribute to Dash-User-Contributions, usually because my docset diverges from one that was already contributed or there is already an official version of the docset:

- -

Additional docsets I have desire to package in the future include:

- -

"WIP" indicates that some working model exists, but has not yet been successfully pushed to Dash-User-Contributions

+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Name (with link to generation upstream)Documentation Source UpstreamContributed to Dash-User-Contributions?Relevant Debian Package
debmakehttps://salsa.debian.org/debian/debmakeYesdebmake-doc
flexhttps://github.com/westes/flexYesflex-doc
GNU Autoconfhttps://www.gnu.org/software/autoconf/Yesautoconf-doc !
GNU Autoconf Archivehttps://www.gnu.org/software/autoconf-archive/Yesautoconf-archive
GNU Automakehttps://www.gnu.org/software/automake/Yes
GNU Bashhttps://www.gnu.org/software/bash/Nobash-doc !
GNU Binutils [CONCEPT]https://www.gnu.org/software/binutils/No
GNU Bison ^3.8.2https://www.gnu.org/software/bison/Yesbison-doc
GNU C Library (or "glibc")https://www.gnu.org/software/libc/libc.htmlPending (see PRs)glibc-doc-reference
GNU Coding Standards *https://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnustandardsYesgnu-standards !
GNU Coreutils [WIP]https://www.gnu.org/software/coreutils/No
GNU Grub (4 docsets) [WIP]https://www.gnu.org/software/grub/No
GNU Guile 3+ (maintainer only)https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/Yes
GNU Guix [CONCEPT]https://guix.gnu.org/No
GNU Libtool *https://www.gnu.org/software/libtool/Yeslibtool-doc !
GNU Texinfo (2 docsets) [WIP]https://www.gnu.org/software/texinfo/No
Mesonhttps://mesonbuild.com/index.htmlYes
ncurseshttps://invisible-island.net/ncurses/Yesncurses-doc
NSIS [WIP]https://nsis.sourceforge.io/Nonsis-doc
+

'*' indicates that the docset creation script could use improvement, usually in indexing index entries
'^' indicates that a new version needs to be packaged, uploaded to the releases tab of the repo, and pushed to Dash-User-Contributions
'!' indicates that the files this package ships do not match what the generation script expects (i.e., documentation is shipped as a single HTML file, as opposed to one HTML file for each node)

+

Some docsets I do not intend to contribute to Dash-User-Contributions, usually because my docset diverges from one that was already contributed or there is already an official version of the docset:

+

Some docsets are marked "[WIP]". This indicates that some working model exists, but has not yet been successfully pushed to Dash-User-Contributions.

+

Some docsets marked as "[CONCEPT]". This indicates that I have desire to package in the future include.

Regarding GNU project docsets

It has been tiring to manage the high redundancy of the code in my various docset generation repos. This is especially true among GNU project docsets, and I believe it would be beneficial to contain all of these in a single repo. A few things to note:

-- cgit