Post-class 01/27

2 files changed, 43 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/class_notes_01-24.md b/class_notes_01-24.md
index dae6e3d..dbc9114 100644
--- a/class_notes_01-24.md
+++ b/class_notes_01-24.md
@@ -64,3 +64,7 @@ In the reading, we learned about 3 kinds of sources: primary sources, secondary
 	- Genre
 	- Author Name
 	- Title
+
+---
+
+[-> Notes 01/27](Class_Notes_01-27.md)
diff --git a/class_notes_01-27.md b/class_notes_01-27.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..96c0c66
--- /dev/null
+++ b/class_notes_01-27.md
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+[\<- Notes 01/24](Class_Notes_01-24.md)
+
+---
+
+# Flashwriting: Short Essay Response
+
+In reading the feedback for my Close Reading Short Essay, I notice that the majority of the issues stem from improper citations and grammar. This paper, then, will be important to look back on the ensure I don't repeat said grammatical and citational errors. The essay was also critiqued as having a weak argument in some sections, which I believe I could have addressed better.
+
+---
+
+# Critical Summary and Response to an Article
+
+## Steps to Creating an Annotated Bibliography
+
+1. [Proper MLA Citation](https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/mla_style/mla_formatting_and_style_guide/mla_works_cited_electronic_sources.html)
+
+2. Evaluate how authoritative the source is in a paragraph
+	- Is the publisher reputable?
+	- Peer-reviewed?
+	- Credibility of Author?
+	- Article Citations?
+	- Intended Audience?
+	- Timeliness of the Article?
+
+3. Summarize the Article in a paragraph
+	- Best done by reviewing an intro paragraph from the Article, then briefly looking over body paragraphs for details
+	- Look for Section Headers, Topic Sentences
+	- Remember, the summary should be **about the Article**, not the text that it is covering
+
+4. Respond to the Article with critical thinking
+	- Do you agree with the claim of the author?
+	- Why is the article relevant?
+	- Anything you want to add that the article author did not include?
+	- Any critiques against the article?
+
+## Example of Summary: A Scopophiliac Fairy Tale: Deconstructing Normative Gender in Angela Carter's "The Bloody Chamber"
+
+The author makes various claims in this text relating the retelling of Bluebeard ("The Bloody Chamber") to themes of challenging gender roles and themes of fetishism and sexuality.  Specifically, the author of the article covers the topics of comparison between "The Bloody Chamber" and "Bluebeard",  fetishism and general sexuality in "The Bloody Chamber", themes of narcissism in "The Bloody Chamber", and finally an alternative perspective on the themes discussed in the article.
+